eridaaa
DE
Multi-agent AI · Freelancer to Enterprise

Automatic document review.
Against every requirement.

veridaaa reviews documents against contracts, requirements, standards and norms — with a self-verifying multi-agent architecture. The project schedule is continuously considered, red paths surfaced early. From freelancer to enterprise, with or without connected database. veridaaa augments experts — it does not replace them.

Get in touchHow it works
For every company size

From freelancer to enterprise.

Reviewing documents against requirements is not the job of any single company size — it's a core process everywhere. veridaaa adapts: with or without a connected database, for a single user or hundreds, for single documents or entire project archives.

Freelancer & Solo

One document, reviewed instantly

No IT setup, no database. Upload a document, pick a review basis (e.g. requirements list or contract), receive comments. A second opinion before you submit.

Small team & SME

Take specialist load off generalists

In SMEs, standards checks, tender reviews and QA land on the desks of generalists. veridaaa augments them — the domain decision stays with the human.

Mid-market

Structured review across domains

Multiple expert agents mirror your departments. The compiler agent consolidates comments, the quality agent verifies — in real time, without breaking the workflow.

Enterprise

Integrated into your DMS, scales to mega-projects

Connected to ThinkProject, OnBase, SharePoint, Relatics, ProjectWise and more. 15,000+ documents per project, hundreds of expert agents in parallel. Same architecture — just bigger.

Typische Anwendungsfälle.

Tender

Review your bid against the full tender

You upload the tender input (specification, contract, requirements list) and your bid text. veridaaa reviews every requirement: is it addressed? Completely? With which clause? Nothing slips through.

Standards check

Technical documents against DIN, ISO, VDE

Systematic comparison of your documents against the applicable norms. Deviations are marked with source reference — your expert reviews and decides.

Contract as reference

Compare documents against contracts

The contract serves as a review basis: technical proposals, delivery documents, scope descriptions are compared against deadlines, clauses and commitments. The legal assessment remains with the lawyer — veridaaa provides the groundwork.

Quality assurance

A second opinion before sign-off

Multi-agent review as an additional verification layer before a document leaves your house. Approval stays with the human expert.

veridaaa runs without its own IT department, norms library or database — and still scales in both directions: single user or international team.

Case example
Offshore wind · document-intensive environment · anonymised

Einsetzbar in jeder Branche mit Prüfprozessen

Offshore & EnergyRail & Rail InfrastructureConstruction & Civil EngineeringAutomotivePharma & Life SciencesMechanical EngineeringPlant EngineeringPublic Sector
Architecture in real time
Pluggable into your process

One orchestrator, unlimited agents — mirrors your organisation.

Every incoming document is recognised by the orchestrator and dispatched to specialised AI agents. You build these agents around your org structure — one agent per domain, as many as you want. A compiler agent cross-checks the comments, a quality agent validates before the results reach the expert.

Document pipeline · live
real-time
Document
Specification · Bid · TQ
Orchestrator
routes · dispatches
Expert agents · n×
Electrical Engineering · Structural Engineering · Contract Law · …
Compiler
cross-checks
Quality
final check
Expert
Approval · Chat
Document

Specification, contract, tender, TQ, norm — any format.

Orchestrator

Detects document type and content. Dispatches to the responsible expert agents.

Expert agents

Set up along your org structure — as many as you like, each focused on its domain.

Compiler agent

Consolidates comments, cross-checks them, detects conflicts and gaps.

Quality agent

Final check: citations, consistency, deduplication — before anything reaches the expert.

Subject-matter expert

Sees validated comments with exact source references. Can challenge, drill down or request more detail via chat — data-based. Decides and approves.

Orchestrator, agent swarm, compiler and quality check run in parallel — in real time. No overnight batch runs.

Pluggable into your existing process — as an additional review layer before sign-off, without replacing existing workflows.

0 %
Traceability against requirements & standards
0 %
Relief from administrative overhead
0×
More efficient review cycles per team
Dialogue with the agents

Every response can be challenged — data-based.

One comment isn't enough? Ask back. Through a chat window, challenge every agent response, request more information or probe deeper. Every answer stays data-based: with source reference to chapter, page, paragraph — never hallucination.

  • Challenge comments

    "Why do you rate this as a gap?" — the agent explains, cites the source and shows the concrete reference in the document.

  • Request more context

    "Give me all similar clauses in other contracts." The agent delivers — with exact location.

  • Alternative perspectives

    "How would the contract expert see this?" The chat reaches specific agents in your swarm.

  • Every answer data-based

    No hallucination. Every claim is tied to a source — or marked as "not substantiated".

Dialogue with the agents
live
Review agent · Electrical engineering

§4.2 Emergency-stop redundancy: implemented single-channel only — deviation from ER 4.2.1.

Why do you rate this as a deviation? Where is that in the ER?

Source verified

ER 4.2.1, chapter 3, page 18, paragraph 2: "Dual-channel with testability." The document shows only one channel in fig. 4 (p. 12).

Update the comment per my specific request — explicitly require a dual-channel implementation with testability.

Ask a follow-up, request a source, address a specific agent …
Project assistant

Ask your project — in real time.

Every uploaded document — contracts, specifications, norms, TQs, comments, revisions and the project schedule — becomes part of a project-specific AI. You ask questions in natural language and receive well-founded, source-cited answers. Every answer can be challenged, deepened, or cross-checked against other documents and dates.

  • Asks the whole project

    Not just single documents: the AI draws on your entire project corpus — contracts, ERs, norms, TQs, revisions, existing comments and the project schedule.

  • Every answer with source

    Chapter, page, paragraph. You see instantly what the statement is based on — or that it is not yet substantiated.

  • Challenge & dig deeper

    "Explain that in more detail", "Show me contradicting clauses", "Which norms contradict this commitment?" — the AI goes deep.

  • Project-specific, not generic

    The AI only knows what you give it. No hallucination from training data — answers live from the current project context.

  • Accessible to every role

    Project managers, domain experts, procurement, legal — everyone finds in seconds what would otherwise take hours.

  • Human decides

    The AI provides the groundwork. Assessment and approval always remain with the expert.

Project assistant · Offshore Wind Alpha
indexed
Which corrosion-protection requirements apply to offshore platform B?
3 sources

Three documents apply jointly to platform B:

  • ER 4.2.1: Corrosion category C5-M, coating per DIN EN ISO 12944-2.
  • Contract §7.4: 20-year protection without scheduled maintenance.
  • TQ-2431: Coating-thickness test report open — response pending.
Example questions
Which corrosion protection requirements apply to offshore platform B?Are there contract clauses that conflict with the current schedule?Which documents are overdue per schedule and block others?Show me all open TQs for chapter 4.2 of the specification.Which norms were added in revision 03?Where was requirement ER-412 addressed in the bid?
Impact

What measurably changes.

Today, domain experts spend 60–70 % of their time on document-related overhead instead of their actual work. veridaaa returns most of that time — without replacing any role. The effects are structurally identical at every scale.

Time on core work
+60 %more focus

Document management falls away — expert time flows into assessment and decision-making, where the leverage is greatest.

Review speed
5–10×faster

Review cycles that used to take days complete in hours. Full tender reviews instead of samples.

Coverage
100 %requirements

Every requirement is checked — not just the ones someone happened to find. Complete instead of selective.

Today (without veridaaa)
  • Sample-based reviews — completeness not guaranteed
  • Days or weeks per bid review
  • Experts spend most of their time searching documents
  • Norms and contract knowledge sits with individuals
With veridaaa
  • 100 % requirements coverage on every review
  • Hours instead of days — even for 15,000-document projects
  • Experts work on decisions, not archives
  • Knowledge is in the system — scalable and traceable
Additional — often even bigger than the time savings

No new specialist hires

Norms experts and in-house lawyers cost fixed salaries — and are hard to find. veridaaa provides the groundwork; your existing experts decide as before, only better informed.

More projects in parallel

Shorter bid and review phase ⇒ the same team handles more tenders in parallel. Typically 30–50 % more submitted bids with identical headcount.

Less rework & penalties

Overlooked requirements are expensive — they lead to change orders in late project phases or to contract penalties. veridaaa surfaces them before the document leaves the house.

Measurably fewer mistakes

A self-verifying multi-agent process consistently sits below 1 % of undetected requirements in sample audits. The human expert becomes the safety net — no longer the only filter.

Focus over document flood

Experts are no longer burned on routine documentation. Lower churn, reduced burnout risk, lower recruiting costs — especially in markets tight on talent.

Audit trail included

Every comment is source-referenced (chapter, page, paragraph). Verifiability for certifiers, auditors and customers — without additional documentation effort.

Effects scale in both directions: from freelancer with one tender to mega-project with 15,000+ documents. Every review is signed off by a subject-matter expert — veridaaa replaces no one, it prepares the decision.

Ready to transform your review processes?

Talk to us about a pilot — from mega-project to single bid review.

Get in touch